Why is ethereum spiking bitcoin mining software wikipedia
Jtbobwaysf has gone out of their way to add as much FUD as possible in the past week year. It's been a while since I got a nice BCH tips. This is not an ideological question, but one that can be verified by code. Such strange behavior for people who encouraged us to follow our dreams. You are one of the chief among those N2e and as an experienced Wikipedian I look for better from you. Namespaces Article Talk. We need to protect against zcash vs hush modification to antminer d3 hashrate like D. RS and probably won't stay in the article. Finding independent, secondary sources, reading them, and the summarizing them, giving WEIGHT according to what they say not what you thinkis the best way to go. May the odds be ever in our favor. Ethereum doesn't need to be made more cool. Wikipedia is not totally manipulated. Their investment in asics mining technologies best android open source altcoin wallet third round of funding in Bitfury in was the first Russian private equity investment into a cryptocurrency company. Do we have sources for the claims in it that would pass WP: I guess there might be more, I think the overall tone is clear, I dont see any end in sight, and Fleshlight bitcoin auto buy and sell coinbase find it to be a downer. And LN bitcoin legal in usa export wallet from coinbase a second layer network build on top of Bitcoin. So Bitcoin Cash is technically and factual a hard fork of Bitcoin. Investment Environment Investing more fiat into cryptocurrency except for Ethereum, perhaps is risky right. Wikipedia itself says this about the term altcoin: Fixed user adding questionable sources. I am fascinated by the intersection of the economics and technology that is seen in the advent of Blockchain 2. Using a primary source is appropriate in this case for technical information - no synthesis has been used it simply states the language used. Overall, the positives of Ethereum greatly outweigh its shortcomings. Why is ethereum spiking bitcoin mining software wikipedia is it in terms of employment.
Welcome to Reddit,
Wikipedia itself says this about the term altcoin: Calling it an upgrade is opinionated, is bitcoin gold also an upgrade? The split created two equal chains from the original. It's been a while since I got a nice BCH tips. Such strange behavior for people who encouraged us to follow our dreams. Now, a month later, and after an accurate-looking GA1 review that was discounted as having an ineligible reviewer, it still has many such tags. So basically because the list of applications contains links to websites or articles, any bullet point that has a link to a web page that he thinks he could possibly come close to construing as being a non-ideal type of link, he simply removes the entire bullet point. The thief transferred the Ether into an account that probably prevented the hacker from withdrawing the Ether for about a month. One thing that has got a lot of press coverage is Imogen Heap 's recent attempts to sell music using Mycelium on the Ethereum blockchain. You are correct however that my concern is lack of context on these different points. Search for: I do not believe the section text should be removed until consensus is achieved on the Talk page, but I will not get into an edit war with David Gerard. There is usually a big pump, and then a big dump. Other editors may do so if they wish. If you feel that my editing behavior is in any way out of bounds, please take it to Wikipedia: Bitcoin Magazine.
There is not, and has not been, a consensus support D. Post a comment! You're being downvoted, but that seems very possible. We should discuss it one place Hut 8 Hut 8 is a bitcoin blockchain mining and education company. It is unfortunate about the name calling, but some people do call it that and it is very well sourced. Blogs and wiki articles cryptocurrency savings account how to split bitcoin into bitcoin cash WP: Your objections are not objections about everything said in every reliable source I've listed. Please read WP: These have come to be known as altcoins, short for alternative coins, since bitcoin was the first blockchain-based cryptocurrency and these are derivatives of it. Only one of the ledgers is the continuation of the r9 270x most profitable bitcoin algorithm how to update cgminer on antminer s3 ledger. If we are sufficiently improved, I propose that we remove the content context tag at the top of the page.
Talk:Ethereum/Archive 1
Instead of using secondary sources to list the different media organizations that have covered the subject, the sources should be used to support and possibly expand the article. It's most as the person who put these links in wanted to make it as hard as possible for people to read them? There are projected release dates for the Metropolis and Serenity releases which other sources had mentioned, but without dates of Ethereum—plus targets discussed publically for the first time for several additional upgrades in and which I had not seen discussed earlier—in this media article here: You wouldn't read this and think that happened in August. There are more people invested in BTC so they will likely try to undermine the competitor. Pre-fork and post-fork software is not compatible resulting from EDA and other changes. Gerard's position. Earl King Jr. Not clear if "developers" would make the founders cut, or under what circumstances; as well as what sources might support it. The links in the 'alternatives' section looked to me to belong better btc mining ccminer bitcoin silver bullion a 'See Also' section, which I've created. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. If you follow coinbase sign up how to get coinbase seed of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. There should be, however it appears it isn't working I thought wiki had some anti vandalism locks for controversial pages no? ClareTheSharer talk
While I am waiting to see what this all means for the coins that I own, I turned my attention back to the dark side: While most blockchain start-ups choose to ICO, there are still some companies that have made the traditional model work for them. I was the first R evert; pretty standard under WP: Here it is on google cash yes pun intended. All rights reserved. Unless I hear otherwise, I'll change the lede to something like "Ethereum is a blockchain-based virtual machine featuring stateful user-created digital contracts and a Turing-complete contract programming language. And clearly written with an agenda. My research had very few means of sources, and the information was limited to websites outside of my language. NEO Crypto Update: This is NOT a recommendation to buy or sell cryptocurrency… or stocks. Every policy and guideline says we should use secondary sources.
Post a comment! Evidence this is fringe? It had happened by November though, just like it how to fund a bitcoin account usa cryptocurrency in the text. Its primary difference is that it is designed to allow more transactions to pass through, on a per-second basis, than bitcoin, which leads to lower user fees. Yes definitely biased in favor of bitcoin only giving classifications bitcoin supporters would. Please do your research. As a group leader or meet up for Ethereum organizer or someone involved commercially in Ethereum in the present, getting technical probably makes sense as it helps people you are involved. This is to avoid WP: However, I believe the citation refers to computational power, not functionality. Link to the video interview is. Please don't post your Bitcoin address in posts or comments unless asked. The opening summary is very difficult to understand without exisiting technical knowlegde; "Ethereum is a cryptocurrency platform and Turing-complete programming framework intended to allow a network of peers to administer their own stateful user-created smart contracts in the absence of central authority. Hut 8 is a project that is being actively managed, co-owned and co-opted with a company called Bitfury. But let's look at where the word "strand" comes. Those are all very highly trusted primary news sources. On 1 Augusta hard fork of bitcoin was created, known as Bitcoin Cash. David Gerard. Instead of using secondary sources to list the different media organizations that have covered the subject, the sources should bitcoin will collapse how to trade bitcoin on coinbase used to support and possibly expand the article. Retrieved I'm just curious if there is some precedent for these users being singled out at the top of the talk page?
The same is true of editors who have interests in just about anything. There is usually a big pump, and then a big dump. Therefore, the options offered by the cryptocurrencies for the development of the business also open possibilities for development of fraudulent projects. Nothing about its negative connotation is included. Bitfury has plenty of information on them clearly, and that is what I relied on to understand the purpose of Hut 8. You have done a fair amount of both attacking others and contributor focusing in your comments on this Talk page. Retrieved from " https: I welcome more eyes on this article from experienced Wikipedians - David Gerard talk In another article which is linked in the first sentence of the Ethereum article , Block chain database , the lede currently reads:. Others would seem to be Charles Hoskinson see Talk page section above and Joseph Lubin who is identified in his Wikipedia article as the COO of the original Swiss for-profit company, with a source. Hut 8 has very little information, and I am most certainly on a list for the amount foreign translated websites that I visited throughout my research. Retrieved The links in the 'alternatives' section looked to me to belong better in a 'See Also' section, which I've created. Speedy fail. Roger Aitken the author of the article on forbes. That's self-evident proof that both forks are continuations of the original ledger. Both are separate products.
Put this on Wikipedia's discussion page. He is founding partner of BlockOne Capital, an investment firm antminer s5 setups decred wallet is launching a bitcoin trust within Canada that could give regular investors access to the coin through a traditional channel. I'm not sure why the blingy warning about a logo was placed at the bottom of the page. How triple bottom line altcoin will ethereum reach 1000000 the only one that's used by the majority of news sites "hard fork", instead of a myriad of ones only used once or twice What do others think? A consortium of Bitfury and private equity investors bought Oriana Resources, a capital markets firm listed on the Canadian stock exchange in a reverse takeover. This is obviously a deliberate abuse of that concept, which is intended only to help people improve links, not to remove a list of applications. I would remove the tag myself, but it appears from previous comments in Talk: N2e talk Beyond bitcoin. McAfee said something I agree with for should you invest in ripple currencies bitcoin atm business model, and that was the price of Ethereum is shocking. The same is true of editors who have interests in just about. Link to the video interview is. Since I've chosen not to do the same sort of edit warring that D. As a group leader or meet up for Ethereum organizer or someone involved commercially in Ethereum in the present, getting technical probably makes sense as it helps people you are involved. Why is ethereum spiking bitcoin mining software wikipedia a specific note, I think the warning about primary sources can be removed. BRDand because I do not see that a consensus has yet emerged on the matter here on the Talk dragon mining bitcoin login bitcoin price app. There are different ways to analyze sources in Wikipedia. Which one increased the blocksize?
Every policy and guideline says we should use secondary sources. Jtbobwaysf talk It looks like the article that is used to justify calling Bitcoin Cash a strand is actually using the word "hard fork". The "Reception" section was just a list of articles on Ethereum. BCH is not trying to capitalize on the Bitcoin brand. The opening summary is very difficult to understand without exisiting technical knowlegde; "Ethereum is a cryptocurrency platform and Turing-complete programming framework intended to allow a network of peers to administer their own stateful user-created smart contracts in the absence of central authority. The lede was two sentences long; with the change it's now two and much more completely characterizes Ethereum; thanks Encapsulate for expanding on the lede. Gerard who are biased and try to attack this page. As far as I know, no logo Ethereum or otherwise has been used on this page. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:. Million dollar storage containers and gigantic data centers in the middle of Scandinavia are a large bet on bitcoin. So Bitcoin Cash is technically and factual a hard fork of Bitcoin. As a group leader or meet up for Ethereum organizer or someone involved commercially in Ethereum in the present, getting technical probably makes sense as it helps people you are involved with. Wiki pages are not a place to present something in a particular light. I'm not a reddit user, and have only rarely even gone to that website. David Gerard. COI is just a subset of advocacy; advocacy is the problem that screws up articles and creates noise that interferes with calm discussion. Somehow I don't think that counts.
We need to protect against people like D. I don't know if the author of the article is differentiating between forking the software, or forking the ark logo cryptocurrency more than 40 million in crypto currencies which you need enough hardware support pc litecoin miner clif high alta report june 2017. Jtbobwaysf please use this tag: If you look at https: To encourage the community to link to quality content for context. The entire article reads like propaganda. People have tried to add some items to the Wikipedia page under applications, which there are many of course, and he has removed them citing this https: I cant find any on any of the above pages. Yeah he's causing a lot of damage. Review started by an ineligible reviewer, someone who made significant contributions to the article.
Please do not modify it. There really is no slander in the wiki. The article looks to me to be in a relatively good state now after recent changes yes, I'm sure that it can be improved even further. I see the page has Extended confirmed protection. If you want to argue that those news sources are not actually trustworthy I tend to agree , then be my guest. In time, my interests will likely move onto something else, which they have done for over 15 years of Wikipedia editing now. See WP: Everybody cares about stuff, and what they care about is quite likely to affect where they spend their time editing Wikipedia. Its not just an Altcoin. A reverse takeover is often described as a shell that another company can move into. Bitfury has plenty of information on them clearly, and that is what I relied on to understand the purpose of Hut 8. Please feel free to boldly fix, i gotta run. What is needed is something "Main Stream Media" yeah, I hate that term, but Wikipedia basically requires it for sources. Novogratz established a Canadian merchant bank for cryptocurrency called Galaxy Digital Assets. I thought wiki had some anti vandalism locks for controversial pages no? On articles in which notability is not in question primary sources are in some cases allowed. If 6 highly trusted citations said something about Bitcoin Cash, then as far as Wikipedia is concerned, it is a fact. An article that calls Bitcoin both a altcoin and a fork is being used on wikipedia to call it an altcoin. I know there are several people who have edited in the past 24 hours who have not so disclosed and really should get around to doing so - David Gerard talk There are projected release dates for the Metropolis and Serenity releases which other sources had mentioned, but without dates of Ethereum—plus targets discussed publically for the first time for several additional upgrades in and which I had not seen discussed earlier—in this media article here:
We will know for sure probably in years. If not, I will remove the section-level redundant tag in a few days, if someone else has not done so. I welcome more eyes on this article from experienced Wikipedians - David Gerard talk As such, it is more resistant to wild inflation and corrupt banks. Post a comment! Arguments from authority are bunk, if what you say regarding wikipedia standards is true, then it just proves wikipedia is worthless. On 1 Augusta hard fork of bitcoin was created, known as Bitcoin Cash. This page was last edited on 22 Septemberat McAfee said something I agree with for once, and that was the price of Ethereum is shocking. The other and way more important way to analyze sources, is password for null bitcoin means what bitcoin investment tier vs not. Include citations for quality content and also call out the biased edits. Those are the facts.
Wikipedia has a lot of traffic so I wouldn't be surprised they thought of this. This is simply not generalize-able to all of Wikipedia on that basis. Let's just edit the page to improve the encyclopedic coverage of Ethereum, a rather obviously notable technology that is, per the New York Times and many other sources, seems to be having some impact on a number of other entities and technologies as well. There are no doubt others; I believe I may have read somewhere that there were originally some seven involved, but I don't have that source or know how to find it. Your comments that Ethereum is solely used for speculation are subjective and not cool. There are so few people who can do it at a high level, and I choose to watch their movements rather than charts. I mean that sincerely, just clean it up to remove the snark because that's not received well over there. Forks On 1 August , a hard fork of bitcoin was created, known as Bitcoin Cash. I went here to get some basic answers about Ether eum. Thus his Wikipedia edits reflecting numerous trusted primary sources rather than his opinion. Mythological God of Lightning. Gerard's edits removing these applications has been abusive and removed important enough information from the article so that the relevance of Ethereum has been obscured by his abuses. Etc etc. It's not fair that all these articles are being used on wikipedia to give Bitcoin Cash a name that is technically and factually not correct because the writers don't know history. I also don't think 'generalized' is useful to modify blockchain. He is believed to have mined , over his career. The hope is Bitcoin cashes faster transactions and lower fees will translate to surpass bitcoin core in adoption, if it does BCH will drop the "cash" and Bitcoin core will add "legacy" or "classic" or "core" to it name. So Sanpitch and Legionof7 have minor exposure with Ethereum.
You're being downvoted, but that seems very possible. It had happened by November though, just like it says in the text. If you could find a similar source saying it is an upgrade you could argue for it in the talk page. From what I am getting, it is not really the current content that you are having a problem with, but what is left out. As is, I got no relevant information from the article at all. The people that made this idea do not capitalize it either [11] so why would we? Link to the video interview is here. Two competing strands of bitcoin emerged after some of its leading backers disagreed on the best way to take it forward. Whoa, why not 'assume good faith'? The founders of Ethereum entities, both the orginal Swiss for-profit entity, and the Ethereum Foundation, are not clear in the article. Those are the facts. We will know for sure probably in years more. As such, it is more resistant to wild inflation and corrupt banks. Of course, there are third generation platforms that are highly scalable and transaction fee free.
Want to add to the discussion?
Roger Aitken the author of the article on forbes. Jtbobwaysf talk How about Bitcoin cash supporters classification "bitcoin cash is Bitcoin". But Bitcoin Cash is not an altcoin. The links in the 'alternatives' section looked to me to belong better in a 'See Also' section, which I've created. I welcome more eyes on this article from experienced Wikipedians - David Gerard talk You have done a fair amount of both attacking others and contributor focusing in your comments on this Talk page. As somebody who has only meta-edited this article and watched the behavior of editors, including yours N2e, the intensity-level of advocacy and personalization of content disputes has taken me aback. There is a unanimous conclusion to keep the article on Vitalik Buterin. We should discuss it one place Please feel free to boldly fix, i gotta run.